home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
110193
/
1101330.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-02-26
|
4KB
|
82 lines
<text id=93TT0421>
<title>
Nov. 01, 1993: Stop Polluting, Please
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
Nov. 01, 1993 Howard Stern & Rush Limbaugh
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
ENVIRONMENT, Page 71
Stop Polluting, Please
</hdr>
<body>
<p>Clinton bets that industry will cut back on greenhouse-gas emissions
voluntarily
</p>
<p>By MICHAEL D. LEMONICK--Reported by Ted Gup/Washington
</p>
<p> Ever since the threat of global warming seared its way into
public consciousness during the record-breaking heat wave of
1988, environmentalists have been pushing governments to take
action. Auto engines, power plants and landfills spew out carbon
dioxide, methane and other heat-trapping gases by the ton. Left
unchecked, many scientists believe, the buildup in the atmosphere
could create the greenhouse effect, boosting temperatures and
changing weather patterns in unpredictable, probably destructive
ways. At last year's Rio Earth Summit, world leaders agreed
that emissions of greenhouse gases should be curbed, but at
the insistence of the U.S., the resulting treaty contained no
firm goals or mandatory steps. The White House didn't get serious
about the issue until the election of eco-conscious Bill Clinton,
who pledged in April to forge a concrete strategy against what
he calls "perhaps the biggest environmental threat to this planet."
</p>
<p> Yet when Clinton's "Climate Change Action Plan" finally debuted
last week, environmentalists could muster only faint praise.
Aimed at rolling back greenhouse emissions to 1990 levels by
the year 2000, the document lists 50 initiatives, including
incentives to spur use of public transit and expanded programs
to promote energy efficiency. But there are two major omissions:
the plan does nothing to raise auto-fuel-economy standards,
and it contains no energy-tax hikes to boost conservation.
</p>
<p> Most disturbing to the green brigade, the measures are mostly
voluntary. Says William Roberts of the Environmental Defense
Fund: "If voluntary programs don't work, you better have a backup."
The backup here seems to be wait and see: if it isn't working
in a few years, Clinton will propose tougher measures.
</p>
<p> In fairness, the White House insists that its ideas on auto-fuel
economy will appear in an upcoming proposal. And the President
wants to fight global warming without weakening the economy,
losing jobs or hurting American competitiveness. Since the Administration
already faces a battle with Congress over health-care reform,
it made sense to avoid calls for new legislation, especially
energy taxes. Remember how quickly Congress extinguished the
BTU tax during the budget debate.
</p>
<p> Instead of laying out laws and regulations, the plan relies
heavily on "partnerships for progress," in which the government
will help industry decide how to spend the $60 billion (the
White House's suggested figure) in private-sector money needed
to reach the pollution-reduction target by the year 2000. Government
agencies, for example, will help businesses evaluate their heating
systems and suggest ways to make them more energy efficient.
</p>
<p> That's fine--if companies are interested in investing money
now to reap savings later. But many executives insist that scientists
have not absolutely proved that significant global warming will
occur. While that's true, the evidence was enough to persuade
dozens of nations to sign the Rio treaty. Clinton is counting
on industry to accept that even if climate change is not a certainty,
it's smart to buy some insurance against disaster.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>